A no case to answer submission has been filed in the case against former Prime Minister Voreqe Bainimarama and suspended Police Commissioner Sitiveni Qiliho.

Defense Lawyer Devanesh Sharma filed the submission today while making a number of arguments.

Earlier on, Former Acting Commissioner of Police Rusiate Tudravu told the court during cross-examination that the Chair of the National Security Council and Prime Minister at that time had suggested to ‘Tuks’ to stay away from the investigation into USP.

Sharma questioned if the statement made by Bainimarama was enough for the court to be satisfied that he was attempting to pervert the course of justice.

He adds that the question that comes to mind is what the context of that conversation was.

Sharma argued that apart from that one-line statement, there is no other evidence.

He adds that the only evidence against the first accused (Bainimarama) is his own statement.

Sharma says Bainimarama’s statement was not that he told the second accused to stop the investigation, saying he was making a suggestion.

It is alleged that Qiliho, on July 15, 2020, as the Police Commissioner, directed the Director of the Criminal Investigations Department, Serupepeli Neiko, and Inspector Reshmi Dass to stop the investigation into the police complaint by the University of the South Pacific in the abuse of the authority of his office, which was an arbitrary act prejudicial to the rights of USP.

However, Sharma says that in Qiliho’s caution interview, he mentioned that he had asked for the investigation to be halted so that he could receive a summary in order to see how to proceed with the case and that, in his opinion, the case was still open.

Director of Public Prosecutions David Toganivalu gave a verbal response but will be providing a written response by Friday.

Toganivalu will also make an oral submission on Monday.

Sharma will be given time to respond, following which Magistrate Seini Puamau will make a decision.

Puamau will deliver her judgment in the submission at 11am on Monday.

Bainimarama is charged with a count of attempting to pervert the course of justice, while Qiliho is charged with a count of abuse of office.

The charges stem from a complaint filed by the University of the South Pacific in July 2019 pertaining to the conduct of former staff members.

Related Stories:

Neiko aware of Qiliho’s concern

Defence to file no case to answer in Bainimarama and Qiliho trial

Neiko tells of phone conversation

Tribunal to investigate former Police Commissioner

Defence considers filing no case to answer in Bainimarama and Qiliho trial

New revelations in Qiliho, Bainimarama case

State to call eighth witness

Bainimarama and Qiliho trial resumes

Qiliho alleged to have stopped USP investigation

Fourth witness to take stand in Bainimarama, Qiliho trial

Tudravu testifies in Bainimarama, Qiliho trial

USP Council opted for BDO instead of FICAC: Witness

FICAC investigated mismanagement of funds at USP

No idea about leaked report: Witness

First witness to continue evidence in Bainimarama and Qiliho trial

Witness testifies on mismanagement complaint by union leaders

USP director testifies about alleged mismanagement and interference

First witness takes stand in Bainimarama, Qiliho trial

Bainimarama and Qiliho to stand trial